Bug#363061: tetex-extra: palatcm.sty is non-free

2006-04-20 Thread Ralf Stubner
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 14:08 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > The other instances of \DeclareFontShape don't point to a font? Like > > \DeclareFontShape{OMS}{pplcm}{l}{n}{<->ssub * pplcm/m/n}{} > > Is this just a declaration to substitute pplcm/l/n with pplcm/m/n? Yes, this is a (silent) substit

Bug#363061: tetex-extra: palatcm.sty is non-free

2006-04-20 Thread Frank Küster
Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sure. And I'll try to document how to find such things. Thanks for the explanation! > Starting point is /usr/share/texmf-tetex/tex/latex/palatcm/palatcm.sty. > In there different symbol fonts for the font family 'pplcm' are defined > with encodings OT1,

Bug#363061: tetex-extra: palatcm.sty is non-free

2006-04-20 Thread Ralf Stubner
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 11:51 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > > But you seem to be the person who has the clearest understanding of what > the mess is, and where files are dispersed. Now that we've established > that the thing is non-free - could you provide a list of them, so that > we can remove t

Bug#363061: tetex-extra: palatcm.sty is non-free

2006-04-20 Thread Frank Küster
Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Frank Küster wrote: The fd files in the same directory don't have any copyright or license statement at all; don't know whether they need one. >> >> Even worse, they contain the statement: >> >> %Filename: >> %Created by: tex fontplcm >> %Cre

Bug#363061: tetex-extra: palatcm.sty is non-free

2006-04-19 Thread Ralf Stubner
Frank Küster wrote: >>> The fd files in the same directory don't have any copyright or license >>> statement at all; don't know whether they need one. > > Even worse, they contain the statement: > > %Filename: > %Created by: tex fontplcm > %Created using fontinst v1.335 BTW, the corresponding

Bug#363061: tetex-extra: palatcm.sty is non-free

2006-04-18 Thread Frank Küster
Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The fd files in the same directory don't have any copyright or license >> statement at all; don't know whether they need one. Even worse, they contain the statement: %Filename: %Created by: tex fontplcm %Created using fontinst v1.335 But there's no f

Bug#363061: Implicit granting of rights? (was: Bug#363061: tetex-extra: palatcm.sty is non-free)

2006-04-18 Thread Frank Küster
Hi debian-legal, Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 15:14 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: >> >> , >> | %%% Copyright (C) 1994 Aloysius G. Helminck. All rights reserved. >> | %%% Permission is granted to to customize the declarations in this >> | %%% file to serve

Bug#363061: tetex-extra: palatcm.sty is non-free

2006-04-17 Thread Ralf Stubner
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 15:14 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > > , > | %%% Copyright (C) 1994 Aloysius G. Helminck. All rights reserved. > | %%% Permission is granted to to customize the declarations in this > | %%% file to serve the needs of your installation. However, no permission > | %%% is

Bug#363061: tetex-extra: palatcm.sty is non-free

2006-04-17 Thread Frank Küster
Package: tetex-extra Version: 3.0-16bpo1 Severity: serious palatcm.sty contains a license statement that requires renaming, which is okay according to DFSG #4: , | %%% Copyright (C) 1994 Aloysius G. Helminck. All rights reserved. | %%% Permission is granted to to customize the declarations i