Bug#361562: tetex-extra: package includes ill-formed .bib file

2006-04-24 Thread Ralf Stubner
[taking out the AMS, I don't think they are interested in this discussion] Frank Küster wrote: > Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Actually I think the amsrefs package in teTeX 3.0 is up to date: > [...] >> However, in addition, there seem to be some older files in teTeX, too. >> Maybe

Bug#361562: tetex-extra: package includes ill-formed .bib file

2006-04-24 Thread Frank Küster
Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually I think the amsrefs package in teTeX 3.0 is up to date: [...] > However, in addition, there seem to be some older files in teTeX, too. > Maybe we should delete them from the debian package. Some? Have you compared filelists? Regards, Frank --

Bug#361562: tetex-extra: package includes ill-formed .bib file

2006-04-21 Thread Ralf Stubner
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 17:24 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > > > the current release, dating from 2004, is present > > on ctan and also available from the ams web page > >http://www.ams.org/tex/amsrefs.html > > > > please upgrade. > > Well, that is easily possible for individual users. I don't

Bug#361562: tetex-extra: package includes ill-formed .bib file

2006-04-21 Thread Frank Küster
Dear Mrs. Beeston, AMS Technical Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > after investigating the reported problem, we have > determined that the version of amsrefs included in > tetex is probably old -- this option is obsolete > in version 2. Ooops, sorry for the noise, and thanks for the response

Bug#361562: tetex-extra: package includes ill-formed .bib file

2006-04-21 Thread AMS Technical Support
gentlemen, The file /usr/share/texmf-tetex/bibtex/bib/ams/amsxport-options.bib is badly formed. The author has forgotten that bibtex does not support a comment character. As a result, any latex file which uses this bibliography fails. after investigating the reported problem, w

Bug#361562: tetex-extra: package includes ill-formed .bib file

2006-04-09 Thread Norman Ramsey
> I'm unsure about the other warnings. In fact the file consists of > nothing but the comments and the three lines that produce these > options. This seems to indicate that it is necessary to load some other > bibtex style file before. I tried it in conjunction with my own bibliography, and

Bug#361562: tetex-extra: package includes ill-formed .bib file

2006-04-09 Thread Frank Küster
Norman Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: tetex-extra > Version: 3.0-17 > Severity: normal > > > The file /usr/share/texmf-tetex/bibtex/bib/ams/amsxport-options.bib > is badly formed. The author has forgotten that bibtex does not > support a comment character. As a result, any latex fi

Bug#361562: tetex-extra: package includes ill-formed .bib file

2006-04-08 Thread Norman Ramsey
Package: tetex-extra Version: 3.0-17 Severity: normal The file /usr/share/texmf-tetex/bibtex/bib/ams/amsxport-options.bib is badly formed. The author has forgotten that bibtex does not support a comment character. As a result, any latex file which uses this bibliography fails. : [EMAIL PROTE