On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 05:52:34PM +1000, Steve Kowalik wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Apr 2006 17:40:41 +0200, Marc Haber uttered
> > Since a package cannot be forced to depend on all indirect
> > dependencies, I'd vouch for removing this check. exim4 is also plagued
> > by this, and will have a override adde
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 09:50:57AM +1100, Steve Kowalik wrote:
> I'm not so sure what to do about this bug, since Linda can not check any
> libraries that aren't unpacked into her sandbox. On the one hand, I
> can't remove the check, since that would open one box, and close
> another, but on the ot
Hello,
I've just seen that this bug is now tagged pending.
If the bug was tagged pending because the check was disabled, this mail
may have some interrest, otherwise, you can forget about it.
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 09:50:57AM +1100, Steve Kowalik wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 22:56:55 +0200, Li
Package: linda
Version: 0.3.18
Followup-For: Bug #357727
Seems like the rule should check which library pulls the others...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
4 matches
Mail list logo
