Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Great, merci beaucoup. You've forwarded it to Lars, so that he'll do
> the upload?
Yes, it's the previous message in the bug log. But indeed, I don't
recall having seen it on -tex-maint. Maybe because it has an attachment
of approx. 230 Ko? Hmmm...
> No
Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Florent,
>
> [...]
>
>> any chance that you find time for this?
>
> This is now done.
Great, merci beaucoup. You've forwarded it to Lars, so that he'll do
the upload?
> Sorry for taking so much
Hi,
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Florent,
[...]
> any chance that you find time for this?
This is now done. Sorry for taking so much time, but this is one of
those boring tasks with unclear non-technical choices[1] to make, so...
[1] Who are the copyright holders for $file?
Hi Florent,
Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Great, thank you very much. We now have the permission from all
> copyright holders I could identify for ae. :-)
>
> When I have some time, I'll submit an updated package to Lars with the
> LPPL license applied to all files, which he can rev
Hi,
Rolf Niepraschk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My account has been changed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It would be nice if
> you can change this also in "ae.sty".
This address is the one I tried previously. So, you mean we should use
the @gmx.de one instead, right?
>From a pratical point of view, I th
Dear Rolf,
I'm trying to reach you again using a different address, because my
previous attempt[1] with your @ptb.de address failed.
As part of a license audit in progress for the TeX distributions teTeX
and TeX Live, we Debian[2] TeX maintainers found that a number of files
in the ae package hav
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sebastian Rahtz) wrote:
>> % This work may be distributed and/or modified under the
>> % conditions of the LaTeX Project Public License, either version 1.3
>> % of this license or (at your option) any later version.
>> % The latest version of this license is in
>> %
Not sure if that worked (signing). Lets try again,
agreeing to the LPPL license
sebastian
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
>
> Do you accept that this file be distributed under the LPPL, with the
> following statement, as suggested in the latest version of the LPPL?
>
> % This work may be distributed and/or modified under the
> % conditions of the LaTeX Project Public License, either version 1.3
> % of this lic
Gilbert Ritschard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is to confirm that I accept that the file
>
> ae.sty
>
> be distributed under the LPPL, with the following statement
>
>% This work may be distributed and/or modified under the
>% conditions of the LaTeX Project Public License, either
Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Looking at the ae package, it appears that you hold copyright on the
> following file:
>
> src/aelatin.mtx
>
> Do you accept that this file be distributed under the LPPL, with the
> following statement, as suggested in the latest version of the LPPL?
Dear Matthias,
As part of a license audit in progress for the TeX distributions teTeX
and TeX Live, we Debian[1] TeX maintainers found that a number of files
in the ae package have no license statement, which unfortunately renders
them undistributable.
We think that the most natural choice of lic
Dear Rolf,
As part of a license audit in progress for the TeX distributions teTeX
and TeX Live, we Debian[1] TeX maintainers found that a number of files
in the ae package have no license statement, which unfortunately renders
them undistributable.
We think that the most natural choice of license
Dear Sebastian,
As part of a license audit in progress for the TeX distributions teTeX
and TeX Live, we Debian[1] TeX maintainers found that a number of files
in the ae package have no license statement, which unfortunately renders
them undistributable.
We think that the most natural choice of li
14 matches
Mail list logo
