Bug#350740: SeaMonkey 1.0.x: I'm willing to provide and "own"

2006-05-07 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2006-05-07 Alex Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Seamonkey packaging should be simpler because mozilla-dev (and probably > >all other -dev packages) should be dropped, as other packages will use > >xulrunner. > That doesn't apply in this case, because SM1.0.x is based on the same > code as

Bug#350740: SeaMonkey 1.0.x: I'm willing to provide and "own"

2006-05-07 Thread Alex Vincent
Seamonkey packaging should be simpler because mozilla-dev (and probably all other -dev packages) should be dropped, as other packages will use xulrunner. That doesn't apply in this case, because SM1.0.x is based on the same code as Firefox 1.5.0.x, and neither will be ported over to XULRunner on

Bug#350740: SeaMonkey 1.0.x: I'm willing to provide and "own"

2006-05-07 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2006-05-06 Alex Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I build SeaMonkey on a regular basis, and I'm currently running > Kanotix. If you want me to provide an official SM 1.0.x build for > Debian, and to own the process for providing future releases, I'm > game. > I'm currently compiling SM 1.0.

Bug#350740: SeaMonkey 1.0.x: I'm willing to provide and "own"

2006-05-06 Thread Alex Vincent
I build SeaMonkey on a regular basis, and I'm currently running Kanotix. If you want me to provide an official SM 1.0.x build for Debian, and to own the process for providing future releases, I'm game. I'm currently compiling SM 1.0.1 now, using the official Linux tinderbox ("hoshi") mozconfig.