Hi, All.
On Apr 15 2006, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> Azureus, the Java bit torrent client, ran using the most recent
> version of GIJ 4.1 from experimental. It does not, however, run with
> the version of GIJ 4.1 in testing/unstable.
Thanks for the confirmation of the symptoms.
> I haven't looked in
On 4/15/06, Philipp Klaus Krause <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shaun Jackman wrote:
> > I remembered Azureus working with an experimental version of GIJ 4.1,
> > but now that I have gij-4.1 4.1.0-1 installed from testing/unstable,
> > it doesn't seem to work. It doesn't get past the splash screen sh
Shaun Jackman wrote:
> On 4/15/06, Philipp Klaus Krause <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Rogério Brito wrote:
>>> Indeed, I think that I spoke too soon: I had Azureus 2.4.0.2 up, but the
>>> connections to other peers were always dying (with null pointer
>>> exceptions).
>> Which gij version did you u
On 4/15/06, Philipp Klaus Krause <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rogério Brito wrote:
> > Indeed, I think that I spoke too soon: I had Azureus 2.4.0.2 up, but the
> > connections to other peers were always dying (with null pointer
> > exceptions).
>
> Which gij version did you use? I've seen that prob
Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Apr 14 2006, Shaun Jackman wrote:
>> On 4/14/06, Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Oh, and just for fun (and as an extra point of information), I
>>> downloaded the jar file for 2.4.0.2 from upstream and renamed it to
>>> ~/.azureus/Azureus2.jar and this is the
On Apr 14 2006, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> On 4/14/06, Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Oh, and just for fun (and as an extra point of information), I
> > downloaded the jar file for 2.4.0.2 from upstream and renamed it to
> > ~/.azureus/Azureus2.jar and this is the only non-freely compiled
On 4/14/06, Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, Philipp, Shaun and others that may be interested.
>
> On Jan 30 2006, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> > Great news, Philipp! Thanks for the note. As soon as I have some time
> > for Debian, I'll update the package and push Azureus into main.
>
> Thi
Hi, Philipp, Shaun and others that may be interested.
On Jan 30 2006, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> Great news, Philipp! Thanks for the note. As soon as I have some time
> for Debian, I'll update the package and push Azureus into main.
This is indeed great news and gij has already migrated into testing
GCJ 4.1 has some troubles (internal errors) compiling Azureus 2.4.0.0.
I've sent a note to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If I can resolve this, I'll upload a
package to experimental.
Cheers,
Shaun
On 3/14/06, robin putters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about uploading an Azureus 'pure' debian package to e
How about uploading an Azureus 'pure' debian package to experimental, while GCJ4.1 is not in unstable yet?
Great news, Philipp! Thanks for the note. As soon as I have some time
for Debian, I'll update the package and push Azureus into main.
gij-4.1 will have to move out of experimental and into unstable before
the same can happen for Azureus though.
Cheers,
Shaun
On 1/29/06, Philipp Klaus Krause <[EMA
Package: azureus
Version: 2.3.0.6-1
You probably remember bug #322104, where it was first assumed that
azureus worked with gij-4.0, but it turned that it didn't really
download anything. Since then I occassionally tried azureus with free
java packages.
I finally succeeded with gij-4.1-0exp7, whic
12 matches
Mail list logo
