Maks,
> can you please test against latest klibc 1.3.16,
> has seen lots of changes since and also some mips fixes.
>
> so i'd be curious to hear how it works out?
just came round to try with klibc=1.4.29-1 and it still looks the same:
(sid)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# strace /usr/lib/klibc/bin/uname -
hello kilian,
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Kilian Krause wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/lib/klibc/bin/uname -a
> Segmentation fault
>
> unfortunatelly not. Strace gives:
> execve("/usr/lib/klibc/bin/uname", ["/usr/lib/klibc/bin/uname", "-a"],
> [/* 28 vars */]) = -1 EFAULT (Bad address)
> --- SIGSEG
Hi Maks,
Am Donnerstag, den 12.01.2006, 23:50 +0100 schrieb Maximilian Attems:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 10:21:39PM +0100, Kilian Krause wrote:
> > Subject: mips not listed in Architectures but building fine
> > Package: klibc-utils
> > Version: 1.1.16-1
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > According to
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 10:21:39PM +0100, Kilian Krause wrote:
> Subject: mips not listed in Architectures but building fine
> Package: klibc-utils
> Version: 1.1.16-1
> Severity: normal
>
> According to the changelog of 1.1.16-1 mips was fixed:
>* Add new upstream patches for better hppa and
Package: klibc-utils
Version: 1.1.16-1
Severity: normal
Subject: mips not listed in Architectures but building fine
Package: klibc-utils
Version: 1.1.16-1
Severity: normal
According to the changelog of 1.1.16-1 mips was fixed:
* Add new upstream patches for better hppa and mips support:
5 matches
Mail list logo