On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 12:58:11PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Cool, same fix. I'll apply and also restore DH_OPTIONS afterwards for
> > cleanliness sake. Thank you!
>
> Restoring DH_OPTIONS afterwards is somewhat pointless given that each line
> o
David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Cool, same fix. I'll apply and also restore DH_OPTIONS afterwards for
> cleanliness sake. Thank you!
Restoring DH_OPTIONS afterwards is somewhat pointless given that each line
of a Makefile is run in its own separate shell.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PRO
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 08:45:49PM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 01:27:52AM +0700, Eugene Konev wrote:
> > Yep. Because it looks like dh_shlibdeps ignores -p switch:
> >
> > sh-3.00# DEBTREEDIR=$(pwd)/debian/tmp dh_shlibdeps -v -a -plibx11-6
> > -l$DEBTREEDI
> > R/usr/lib
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 03:14:29AM +0700, Eugene Konev wrote:
>
> Quick hack to fix:
>
> --- xorg-x11-6.9.0.dfsg.1.orig/debian/rules 2006-01-10 03:11:40.0
> +0700
> +++ xorg-x11-6.9.0.dfsg.1/debian/rules2006-01-10 02:56:37.0
> +0700
> @@ -585,7 +585,7 @@
> chmod
Quick hack to fix:
--- xorg-x11-6.9.0.dfsg.1.orig/debian/rules 2006-01-10 03:11:40.0
+0700
+++ xorg-x11-6.9.0.dfsg.1/debian/rules 2006-01-10 02:56:37.0 +0700
@@ -585,7 +585,7 @@
chmod ug+s debian/xserver-common/usr/X11R6/bin/X
dh_installdeb
dh_shlibde
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 02:14:39AM +0700, Eugene Konev wrote:
>
> > Yep. Because it looks like dh_shlibdeps ignores -p switch:
>
> ... and this is exactly the same issue as the one with -dbg packages: -a
> in DH_OPTIONS overrides -p.
Ick. Ok, how about hacking around this by re-defining DH_OPTIO
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 01:27:52AM +0700, Eugene Konev wrote:
> Yep. Because it looks like dh_shlibdeps ignores -p switch:
>
> sh-3.00# DEBTREEDIR=$(pwd)/debian/tmp dh_shlibdeps -v -a -plibx11-6
> -l$DEBTREEDI
> R/usr/lib -l$DEBTREEDIR/usr/X11R6/lib -- -Ldebian/libx11-6.shlibs.local
> LD_
> Yep. Because it looks like dh_shlibdeps ignores -p switch:
... and this is exactly the same issue as the one with -dbg packages: -a
in DH_OPTIONS overrides -p.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Daniel.
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:48:20 +0100
you wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:08:21AM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 04:22:04PM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> > > libXt from 6.9.0.dfsg.1-2 was linked with libX11, but this
> dependency is
> > > not reflected in t
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 12:56:40PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 04:22:04PM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> > (libxt-dev correctly depends on libx11-dev, but this bug can still lead to
> > build failures when dependencies in -dev packages are no longer recursively
> > expanded
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 04:22:04PM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> (libxt-dev correctly depends on libx11-dev, but this bug can still lead to
> build failures when dependencies in -dev packages are no longer recursively
> expanded. Eg. build-depend on libaudio-dev, and linking with -laudio will
> fai
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:08:21AM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 04:22:04PM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> > libXt from 6.9.0.dfsg.1-2 was linked with libX11, but this dependency is
> > not reflected in the Depends: of the binary package:
> >
> > % ldd /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.s
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 04:22:04PM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> libXt from 6.9.0.dfsg.1-2 was linked with libX11, but this dependency is
> not reflected in the Depends: of the binary package:
>
> % ldd /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6
> linux-gate.so.1 => (0xe000)
> libX11.so.6 => /
Package: libxt6
Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
Moi!
libXt from 6.9.0.dfsg.1-2 was linked with libX11, but this dependency is
not reflected in the Depends: of the binary package:
% ldd /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xe000)
14 matches
Mail list logo
