On 02.01.06 Florian Weimer (f...@deneb.enyo.de) wrote:
> Package: tetex-doc
> Version: 3.0-11
> Severity: serious
>
> The license is clearly non-free:
>
> | All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
> | stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> I guess the license is GPL-incompatible, but DFSG-free. And *that* is
>>> not a practical problem, since nobody would want to reuse the code from
>>> tex.web in a new project.
>>
>> But pdfTeX does, and it c
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I guess the license is GPL-incompatible, but DFSG-free. And *that* is
>> not a practical problem, since nobody would want to reuse the code from
>> tex.web in a new project.
>
> But pdfTeX does, and it claims to be GPLed.
That's a good point - but thi
* Frank Küster:
> #218195 is about the woeful copyright file, not the woeful copyright of
> a particular file... What we really need to do is to sort out which
> parts of teTeX are under which license, and document that clearly (and
> remove if necessary), and to that end collecting information a
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Frank Küster:
>
>> Florian, are you on a general search for non-free docs, and looking at
>> more files in tetex-doc? Then please also send a Debbugs-Cc to
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Woeful copyright file").
>
> I'm aware of that bug report, but think of
* Frank Küster:
> Florian, are you on a general search for non-free docs, and looking at
> more files in tetex-doc? Then please also send a Debbugs-Cc to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Woeful copyright file").
I'm aware of that bug report, but think of it as a separate matter
(especially the tex.web stat
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Ralf Stubner:
>
>>> | All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
>>> | stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any
>>> | means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise,
>>> | without
* Ralf Stubner:
>> | All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
>> | stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any
>> | means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise,
>> | without prior written permission of the publisher.
>
> (fr
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 07:27 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Package: tetex-doc
> Version: 3.0-11
> Severity: serious
>
> The license is clearly non-free:
>
> | All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
> | stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by a
Package: tetex-doc
Version: 3.0-11
Severity: serious
The license is clearly non-free:
| All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
| stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any
| means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise,
|
10 matches
Mail list logo
