Bug#344864: backtrace

2005-12-29 Thread David Riebenbauer
Good Morning! * Stuart T. R. Rowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-12-27 14:10]: > last bits of output and then backtrace: > > [ backtrace deleted ] I had the same problem and got a similar backtraceI had the same problem and got a similar backtrace. > > FYI I have "alsasink period-size=1024 buffer-

Bug#344864: backtrace

2005-12-27 Thread Stuart T. R. Rowan
On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 13:00 -0600, Joe Wreschnig wrote: > Are you using amd64 (either the port, or the architecture but running > standard i386 Debian)? This looks a little like > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=323805 No, i386 on a dual athlon-mp 1800+ rig (x86-32) Stu. -- To UNSUB

Bug#344864: backtrace

2005-12-27 Thread Joe Wreschnig
Are you using amd64 (either the port, or the architecture but running standard i386 Debian)? This looks a little like http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=323805 -- Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#344864: backtrace

2005-12-27 Thread Stuart T. R. Rowan
last bits of output and then backtrace: Loaded song library. Opening audio device. (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) Program received signal SIGFPE, Arithmetic exception. [Switching to T