On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 01:23:06AM +0100, Alexandre Pineau wrote:
> > > Can you send the result of ldd /usr/bin/nedit ?
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:]~$ ldd /usr/bin/nedit
> > libXm.so.2 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXm.so.2 (0xb7d9f000)
> At home :
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ldd /usr/bin/nedit
> libX
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:01:48 +0100
Ingo Juergensmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 12:08:37AM +0100, Alexandre Pineau wrote:
>
> > Can you send the result of ldd /usr/bin/nedit ?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:]~$ ldd /usr/bin/nedit
> linux-gate.so.1 => (0xe000)
>
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 12:08:37AM +0100, Alexandre Pineau wrote:
> Can you send the result of ldd /usr/bin/nedit ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:]~$ ldd /usr/bin/nedit
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xe000)
libXp.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXp.so.6 (0xb7f45000)
libXm.so.2 => /usr/X11R6/lib/l
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 15:12:33 +0100
Ingo Juergensmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Now I'm not sure whether Sid users are supposed to fix things like
> > that themselves. Alexandre?
>
> *When* I would fix this, I would download the debian source, edit the rules
> file and build it against lessti
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 07:41:02PM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote:
> * Ingo Juergensmann wrote (2005-12-17 18:40):
> >On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 11:32:47AM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote:
> >> This points to a mismatch in Motif versions.
> >Yes, but why?
> Because Sarge/Edge and Sid version are mixed up. S
Moin,
* Ingo Juergensmann wrote (2005-12-17 18:40):
>On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 11:32:47AM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote:
>> This points to a mismatch in Motif versions.
>
>Yes, but why?
Because Sarge/Edge and Sid version are mixed up. Sid comes with
Lesstif 0.94.4-1, NEdit is compiled against 0.93.94
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 11:32:47AM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote:
> * Ingo Juergensmann wrote (2005-12-16 20:32):
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:]~$ nedit -V
> >nedit: Symbol XmStrings' has different size in shared object, consider
> >re-linking
> This points to a mismatch in Motif versions.
Yes, but why?
Hi,
* Ingo Juergensmann wrote (2005-12-16 20:32):
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:]~$ nedit -V
>nedit: Symbol XmStrings' has different size in shared object, consider
>re-linking
This points to a mismatch in Motif versions.
> With Motif: 2.1.0 [@(#)GNU/LessTif Version 2.1 Release 0.93.94]
>(UNTESTED)
Th
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 09:49:22PM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote:
> * Ingo Juergensmann wrote (2005-12-13 18:55):
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:]~$ nedit
> >nedit: Symbol XmStrings' has different size in shared object, consider
> >re-linking
> >NEdit: Converting .nedit file to 5.5 version.
> >To keep, u
Hi,
* Ingo Juergensmann wrote (2005-12-13 18:55):
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:]~$ nedit
>nedit: Symbol XmStrings' has different size in shared object, consider
>re-linking
>NEdit: Converting .nedit file to 5.5 version.
>To keep, use Preferences -> Save Defaults
>Segmentation fault
Please send us the
Package: nedit
Version: 1:5.5-1
Severity: normal
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:]~$ nedit
nedit: Symbol XmStrings' has different size in shared object, consider
re-linking
NEdit: Converting .nedit file to 5.5 version.
To keep, use Preferences -> Save Defaults
Segmentation fault
I get this on my laptop.
11 matches
Mail list logo