Bug#342969: acknowledged by developer (Not buildable with GCC >=4)

2006-05-12 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-12-12 07:38]: > Let's see what future brings.. According to Real, Helix Player 2 is > ready in Q4 2005. So there will be rather sooner as later a new > version available in 2006. Until then, everything should be kept as > it is. What's the status of Helix

Bug#342969: acknowledged by developer (Not buildable with GCC >=4)

2005-12-11 Thread Daniel Baumann
Let's see what future brings.. According to Real, Helix Player 2 is ready in Q4 2005. So there will be rather sooner as later a new version available in 2006. Until then, everything should be kept as it is. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [E

Bug#342969: acknowledged by developer (Not buildable with GCC >=4)

2005-12-11 Thread Matthias Klose
Daniel Baumann writes: > Matthias Klose wrote: > > So why is it "absolutely not buildable"? > > See #309121, the asm part of hxclient depends on gcc 3.x. Nobody, > including upstream, wants or can fix it to comply with 4.x. Anyway, Real > instead works on a complete rewrite for helix player 2. Unt

Bug#342969: acknowledged by developer (Not buildable with GCC >=4)

2005-12-11 Thread Daniel Baumann
Matthias Klose wrote: > So why is it "absolutely not buildable"? See #309121, the asm part of hxclient depends on gcc 3.x. Nobody, including upstream, wants or can fix it to comply with 4.x. Anyway, Real instead works on a complete rewrite for helix player 2. Until this is ready, helix-player 1.x

Bug#342969: acknowledged by developer (Not buildable with GCC >=4)

2005-12-11 Thread Matthias Klose
reopen 342969 severity 342969 important thanks > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 16:10:06 2005 > Helix Player is absolutely not buildable with GCC >=4. Please do NOT close this report. So why is it "absolutely not buildable"? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "