On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:14:58PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> Hi. I noticed you reopened bug #342709 in portmap on 2006-02-03, but
> did not explain why. Why was it reopened? Was the applied patch
> insufficient to solve the issue, or was there some mistake elsewhere?
>
Hi !
Just a
Hi. I noticed you reopened bug #342709 in portmap on 2006-02-03, but
did not explain why. Why was it reopened? Was the applied patch
insufficient to solve the issue, or was there some mistake elsewhere?
Happy hacking,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
Problem is fixed with the attached patch.
diff -r -u --new-file old/portmap-5/Makefile new/portmap-5/Makefile
--- old/portmap-5/Makefile 2005-12-09 11:49:57.0 -0500
+++ new/portmap-5/Makefile 2005-12-13 10:32:43.0 -0500
@@ -74,6 +74,11 @@
#
ZOMBIES = -DIGNORE_SIGCHLD
Package: portmap
Version: 5-9
Severity: important
I have a heterogeneous network of Un*x boxes, of which several are identical
Debian boxes, networked together using NIS (the server is a Solaris-8 box if
that matters) and mounting/exporting NFS via automount.
During heavy I/O, portmap dies, leav
4 matches
Mail list logo