tag 342550 - security
severity 342550 important
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 10:25:04AM +0100, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * Mike Hommey:
>
> >> Even if the browser cannot be restarted after the attack has been
> >> carried out? The impact of this bug is slightly different from other
* Mike Hommey:
>> Even if the browser cannot be restarted after the attack has been
>> carried out? The impact of this bug is slightly different from other
>> crash bugs.
>
> Are you sure the firefox process was not still running ? That would
> explain the browser not being able to restart...
Ac
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 10:04:43PM +0100, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * Steve Kemp:
>
> >> My ff does not crashed, but it ate really much cpu-time when I tested
> >> slightly modified version of javascript.
> >
> > Not a security issue, "just" a DOS attack.
> >
> > Mozilla.o
* Steve Kemp:
>> My ff does not crashed, but it ate really much cpu-time when I tested
>> slightly modified version of javascript.
>
> Not a security issue, "just" a DOS attack.
>
> Mozilla.org do not regard DOS attacks as security issues, so we cannot
> either.
Even if the browser cannot
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 04:48:07PM +0200, Timo Poikola wrote:
> Package: firefox
> Version: 1.4.99+1.5rc3.dfsg-2
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
>
> http://packetstormsecurity.org/0512-exploits/firefox-1.5-buffer-overflow.txt
>
> My ff does not cra
Package: firefox
Version: 1.4.99+1.5rc3.dfsg-2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
http://packetstormsecurity.org/0512-exploits/firefox-1.5-buffer-overflow.txt
My ff does not crashed, but it ate really much cpu-time when I tested
slightly modified version o
6 matches
Mail list logo
