Bug#340904: Inclusion of .private's "-I"s

2005-12-15 Thread Loïc Minier
(End of the IRC discussion:) 22:42 < Q_> But it's the right way to do it, just because they can relink everything to the new glib, it's not the right way to do it. 22:43 < vorlon> Q_: actually, IME they'll use any excuse to change sonames between stable branches 22:4

Bug#340904: Inclusion of .private's "-I"s

2005-12-14 Thread Loïc Minier
On sam, nov 26, 2005, Loic Minier wrote: > (we had this discussion on IRC already) More bits, the new information here is that people involved in pkg-config think that using headers of another lib in your headers means you have a public dep on this other lib, and that will result in an ELF de

Bug#340904: Inclusion of .private's "-I"s

2005-11-26 Thread Loic Minier
Package: pkg-config Version: 0.20-1 Severity: normal Hi, (we had this discussion on IRC already) It might be nice to use "-I" of the .private pseudo-headers in .pc files each time some -I flags are requested, eg. not only for static builds. As I understand it, the introduction of .