On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 05:37:49PM +, Adonikam Virgo wrote:
> I think a vim-gui-common package makes perfect sense.
Indeed. It already exists in svn.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy
[EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it
Package: vim
Version: 1:6.4-001+2
Followup-For: Bug #338027
The case as it stands is that the `vim' package (not `vim-common')
contains the offending desktop file and gvim binary, whereas one
would expect to find it in the packages with gtk2 support.
It makes more sense from the user's viewpoint
2 matches
Mail list logo
