Bug#329972: Missing initex and virtex

2005-09-27 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 01:04:46PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > Thomas Esser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Personally, I don't know a single user who has ever needed one of the > > vir* commands. And ini*, is provided by passing -ini, e.g. "tex -ini" > > instead of "initex". > > Anton has use

Bug#329972: Missing initex and virtex

2005-09-27 Thread Frank Küster
Thomas Esser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Personally, I don't know a single user who has ever needed one of the > vir* commands. And ini*, is provided by passing -ini, e.g. "tex -ini" > instead of "initex". Anton has used that too, meanwhile, as far as I know. Anton, is it okay to close this bu

Bug#329972: Missing initex and virtex

2005-09-26 Thread Thomas Esser
> | Sun Mar 28 13:14:45 CEST 2004 > | [...] > | * clean up texk/tetex/Makefile for manpage symlinks (initex, virtex > |etc. are no longer installed, so we don't need manpages for this). You can look up the discussion on the texlive list archives -- or try to find this information in the web2

Bug#329972: Missing initex and virtex

2005-09-26 Thread Frank Küster
Hi Thomas, Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The new tetex-bin package doesn't contain soft links for initex and > virtex. Some users will expect them. The changelog says: , | Sun Mar 28 13:14:45 CEST 2004 | [...] | * clean up texk/tetex/Makefile for manpage symlinks (initex,

Bug#329972: Missing initex and virtex

2005-09-24 Thread Anton Zinoviev
Package: tetex-bin Version: 3.0-7 Severity: normal Tags: experimental Hi! The new tetex-bin package doesn't contain soft links for initex and virtex. Some users will expect them. Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E