reassign 329090 kernel-patch-vserver
retitle 329090 barrier not working, but chroot escape does on 2.4 kernel
tags 329090 + moreinfo
merge 329087 329090
thanks
Hi
With this information I'm now reassigning this to the kernel-patch-vserver
package and merging it to the existing bug there.
A simple
Hello
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 02:53:34PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> No, these issues are not present in 2.6 (using the debian 2.6.8 and the
> debian kernel-patch-vserver, both from sarge). I am trying to find out if
> this is a kernel problem with the debian 2.4.27 kernel in sarge, or a
No, these issues are not present in 2.6 (using the debian 2.6.8 and the
debian kernel-patch-vserver, both from sarge). I am trying to find out if
this is a kernel problem with the debian 2.4.27 kernel in sarge, or a
vserver patch problem.
micah
> Hello
>
> To me it would be good to know if any o
Hello
To me it would be good to know if any of these issues are valid
if you use 2.6 kernel and patch from sarge?
Regards,
// Ola
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 07:00:27PM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dear Micah,
>
> Thank you for your tests, I have
Hello
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 08:32:56PM -0400, micah wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> Ok, I've done a few things. First I've tested and determined a number of
> problems with the testfs.sh-0.99 that was being used. Bertl has
> incorporated my changes, and fix
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Micah,
Thank you for your tests, I have downloaded the testfs-0.11.sh and did
the similar tests as yours to help confirm the results.
> Test #1
> Using all debian sarge componants:
> kernel-source: 2.4.27-10 (debian sarge)
> util-vserver: 0.30-2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Ok, I've done a few things. First I've tested and determined a number of
problems with the testfs.sh-0.99 that was being used. Bertl has
incorporated my changes, and fixed a number of others and has made
testfs.sh-0.11 which more accurately repres
reassign 329090 kernel-patch-vserver
thanks
Hello
Thanks a lot for your testing.
Micah could you test with 0.30.208-2 version of util-vserver (from unstable)
and a 2.6 kernel to see if you can remove all the problems?
See below why I would like you do that.
---
I have only tested with ext2 an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
These bug reports are very confusing, I am performing my own tests to
help clarify.
Andrew Lee wrote:
> The VCI shouldn't be if you have setup /dev/loop4 correctly, I
> did same thing and got same errors when I forgot to setup the /dev/
> loop4 aft
Hello
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 01:42:36PM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote:
> Hi Ola,
>
> ?b 2005/10/3 ?W?? 3:39 ???AOla Lundqvist ?g???G
>
> >Now I have run the entire test suite...
> >
> >zircone:/srv/vservers/labradorit/root# ./testfs.sh -l -t -D /dev/
> >loop4 -M /mnt/t
> >Linux-VServer FS Test [V0.0
Package: util-vserver
Severity: minor
Hello
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 01:42:36PM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote:
> Hi Ola,
>
> ?b 2005/10/3 ?W?? 3:39 ???AOla Lundqvist ?g???G
>
> >Now I have run the entire test suite...
> >
> >zircone:/srv/vservers/labradorit/root# ./testfs.sh -l -t -D /dev/
> >loop4 -
Hello
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 01:46:44PM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote:
>
>Hi Ola,
>
>å¨ 2005/10/3 ä¸å 1:54 æï¼Ola Lundqvist 寫å°ï¼
>
>How did you tested and found what kind of security problem?
>
>I assume you found you couldn't pass the test 109,121 of testfs.sh Â
>
>script,
Hi Ola,
在 2005/10/3 上午 3:39 時，Ola Lundqvist 寫到：
Now I have run the entire test suite...
zircone:/srv/vservers/labradorit/root# ./testfs.sh -l -t -D /dev/
loop4 -M /mnt/t
Linux-VServer FS Test [V0.09] Copyright (C) 2005 H.Poetzl
Linux 2.4.27-mppe+ctx+vlan-686-smp i686/0.30.204
VCI: (unkno
Hi Ola,在 2005/10/3 上午 1:54 時，Ola Lundqvist 寫到：How did you tested and found what kind of security problem?I assume you found you couldn't pass the test 109,121 of testfs.sh script, right? Actually I run the rootesc program and saw that it was possible toescape.I think the rootesc program is only wo
Hello
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 09:30:02PM +0200, Christian Aichinger wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 02:47:28PM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> >
> > >> I do not have access to a 2.6 kernel patched with vserver but I
>
Hello
Now I have run the entire test suite...
zircone:/srv/vservers/labradorit/root# ./testfs.sh -l -t -D /dev/loop4 -M /mnt/t
Linux-VServer FS Test [V0.09] Copyright (C) 2005 H.Poetzl
Linux 2.4.27-mppe+ctx+vlan-686-smp i686/0.30.204
VCI: (unknown)
---
testing ext2 filesystem ...
[000]* (ext2
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 02:47:28PM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>
> >> I do not have access to a 2.6 kernel patched with vserver but I
> >> can check on a patched 2.4 kernel with old style patch.
>
> Okay, I have a machine ru
Hi Andrew
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 12:18:47AM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote:
>
> ?b 2005/10/2 ?W?? 5:52 ???AOla Lundqvist ?g???G
>
> >I have now tested on one of my systems and that I have a security
> >problem there.
> >On the other system (2.4.26 + grsec) the problem do not exist. So
> >I'm not
>
在 2005/10/2 上午 5:52 時，Ola Lundqvist 寫到：
I have now tested on one of my systems and that I have a security
problem there.
On the other system (2.4.26 + grsec) the problem do not exist. So
I'm not
sure if I can confim or deny this.
How did you tested and found what kind of security problem?
Hello
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:45:10PM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote:
> Package: util-vserver
> Version: 0.30.204-5sarge2
> Severity: critical
> Tags: sarge
> Justification: root security hole
>
> Dear Ola,
>
> I found the util-vserver in sarge can not pass the test 109 and 121 of
> testfs.sh scrip
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>> I do not have access to a 2.6 kernel patched with vserver but I
>> can check on a patched 2.4 kernel with old style patch.
Okay, I have a machine running 2.6 kernel patched with vserver 2.0, so
what can I help you on 2.6 kerne
Hello
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 01:43:37PM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Is util-vserver from sid necessary for this or is it just the kernel
> > patch that is needed to fix it?
>
> Not sure yet, I have successed passed the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Is util-vserver from sid necessary for this or is it just the kernel
> patch that is needed to fix it?
Not sure yet, I have successed passed the test of testfs.sh script on
powerpc with util-vserver from sid(applied the fix02 pa
Hello
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:45:10PM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote:
> Package: util-vserver
> Version: 0.30.204-5sarge2
> Severity: critical
> Tags: sarge
> Justification: root security hole
>
> Dear Ola,
>
> I found the util-vserver in sarge can not pass the test 109 and 121 of
> testfs.sh scrip
Package: util-vserver
Version: 0.30.204-5sarge2
Severity: critical
Tags: sarge
Justification: root security hole
Dear Ola,
I found the util-vserver in sarge can not pass the test 109 and 121 of
testfs.sh script[1] which provide by upstream author. After more tests,
upstream author discoveried t
25 matches
Mail list logo
