On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 08:36:32AM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> [...] The kernel wants those fd subdirectories not publically
> inaccesable for a reason. I don't know what the reason is, but
> I'm not going against it.
Good point. Also, it might be unportable if other kernels chose to make them
a
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 05:49:56PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> Perhaps printing a message when running as non-root would help. Or even
> consider making it SUID (are there any security implications in providing
> this information to a mallicious user?).
I think that would be annoying. Making it
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 09:25:21PM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 01:04:03PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > It seems it's not capable of detecting open ports whose processes aren't
> > owned
> > by the same user that runs fuser. It should print a warning when this
> > happe
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 01:04:03PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> It seems it's not capable of detecting open ports whose processes aren't owned
> by the same user that runs fuser. It should print a warning when this
> happens.
It's not capable of knowing about any access from any process it cann
Package: psmisc
Version: 21.6-1
Severity: normal
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ fuser 43141/tcp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo fuser 43141/tcp
43141/tcp:6089
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
It seems it's not capable of detecting open ports whose processes aren't owned
by the same user that runs fuser. It shou
5 matches
Mail list logo
