On Aug 27, Teddy Hogeborn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No. Should I have? I am not a programmer. I am reporting a
> potentially useful missing feature, not volunteering to implement it.
> This is what "wishlist" bugs are for, are they not?
> Why are you closing the bug report? Have you forwar
> > > I use IPsec. I would like to block connections to a service if
> > > the client is not using IPsec (similar to only allowing IMAPS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> > Send a patch, and test it well.
> Do you have any plan to work on this?
No. Should I have? I am not a programmer
On Aug 24, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I use IPsec. I would like to block connections to a service if the
> > client is not using IPsec (similar to only allowing IMAPS and not
> Send a patch, and test it well.
Do you have any plan to work on this?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
D
On Aug 24, Teddy Hogeborn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use IPsec. I would like to block connections to a service if the
> client is not using IPsec (similar to only allowing IMAPS and not
Send a patch, and test it well.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: tcpd
Version: 7.6.dbs-8
Severity: wishlist
I use IPsec. I would like to block connections to a service if the
client is not using IPsec (similar to only allowing IMAPS and not
IMAP). IPsec use can be detected by a socket option
(IP_IPSEC_POLICY). It would therefore be useful to me to be
5 matches
Mail list logo
