On Tue, Jan 29, 2008, Clint Adams wrote:
> > Using such an umask causes problems, and bash ships with an
> > /etc/skel/.bashrc which sets the umask to 022.
This is not the case anymore; umask is set in /etc/profile. The
rationale is in bug #155973 where it's proposed that this prevent
sysadm
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 04:23:23PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Using such an umask causes problems, and bash ships with an
> /etc/skel/.bashrc which sets the umask to 022.
>
> I'm well aware that it might not be a zsh bug, still the fact is that
> switching from the default shell to zsh can br
On 30 Sep, Clint Adams wrote:
>
> I'll put "umask 022" in /etc/skel/.zshrc, I suppose.
It would be better to put that in one of zprofile or zlogin. It is
exported to child processes and it could be a nuisance (or even a security
risk) if child shells override the setting.
Oliver
This e-mail an
> What do you think of this issue? Should this be mandated by
> debian-policy? Do you want me to bring the discussion to
> debian-policy?
I'll put "umask 022" in /etc/skel/.zshrc, I suppose.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
Hi,
On mer, aoû 03, 2005, Loïc Minier wrote:
> I just did a fresh installation and dist-upgrade to sid, switched to
> zsh as login shell for root and myself, and the default umask has
> changed. It used to be 022 and is now 077.
What do you think of this issue? Should this be mandat
Package: zsh
Version: 4.2.5-10
Severity: important
Hi,
I just did a fresh installation and dist-upgrade to sid, switched to
zsh as login shell for root and myself, and the default umask has
changed. It used to be 022 and is now 077.
I think the relevant change is in the default logi
6 matches
Mail list logo
