Cosimo Alfarano writes:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 08:33:44AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > that's crap. the C++ ABI did change, that's the reason we change the
> > package name. It has nothing to do with an soname. Please remove this
> > very misleading changelog entry in the parantheses.
>
> T
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 08:33:44AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> that's crap. the C++ ABI did change, that's the reason we change the
> package name. It has nothing to do with an soname. Please remove this
> very misleading changelog entry in the parantheses.
True. I've reedited the changelog at
Package: torch3
* Updated packagename and Co. for GCC 4.0 transition
(note that that's not strictly necessary for libtorch3 since there no
soname provided by upstream, but for simplicity I'll follow the trasition
rules)
that's crap. the C++ ABI did change, that's the reason we c
3 matches
Mail list logo
