On Fri 01 Dec 2006, Andy Spiegl wrote:
>
> > > Also, I tried to backport it to sarge (where I urgently need it)
> > > but didn't succeed because of many compile time errors. :-(
> >
> > How did you try to build it?
> apt-get source rsync
> cd rsync-2.6.9
> dpkg-buildpackage -uc -m"[EMAIL PROTE
Hi Paul,
> > Also, I tried to backport it to sarge (where I urgently need it)
> > but didn't succeed because of many compile time errors. :-(
>
> How did you try to build it?
apt-get source rsync
cd rsync-2.6.9
dpkg-buildpackage -uc -m"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Aiii, I forgot the "-B" and therefore
Hi Paul,
> There's a prerelease of 2.6.9 uploaded to experimental, 2.6.9~pre3-1
> It also has ACL support patched in.
Thanks for the note. I am out of town for a while (actually out of
continent :-) so I didn't check until just now.
I found 2.6.9-2 on unstable, but I don't see any mentioning of
On Thu 21 Sep 2006, Andy Spiegl wrote:
>
> > A 2.6.9 version of rsync is imminent
> Great. Would you mind sending a mail (and to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> when it's available?
There's a prerelease of 2.6.9 uploaded to experimental, 2.6.9~pre3-1
It also has ACL support patched in.
Paul Slootman
--
On Thu 21 Sep 2006, Andy Spiegl wrote:
>
> Hm, actually I wonder whether the patch even made it into sid yet.
A 2.6.9 version of rsync is imminent, and should have that fix (and a couple
of other important fixes) in it, so I prefer to wait a bit for that.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
> > Whoops! Please send over a large trout, I must be confused by the
> > bugs :)
>
> No problem. You can make up for it by backporting it again :)))
Are there any plans for a new backport?
Hm, actually I wonder whether the patch even made it into sid yet.
Does anyone know?
Thanks,
Andy.
--
> Wonderful! However... your last changelog.Debian entry was in
> September 2005, and the patch is from 2006-08-26.
> > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3929
>
> So somehow I doubt that you already included that patch. :-)
Whoops! Please send over a large trout, I must be confused by t
Hi Serge,
> I backported it a long time ago, I thought it was referenced in this bug
> thread? Anyway, you can pick up the package here
>
> deb http://www.vanginderachter.be/downloads/debian/packages/archives sarge
> main
Wonderful! However... your last changelog.Debian entry was in
September
> Whoops! Please send over a large trout, I must be confused by the
> bugs :)
No problem. You can make up for it by backporting it again :)))
Andy.
--
Many people easily confuse innovation with the latest
influenza epidemia from Redmond.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 19:28 +0200, Andy Spiegl wrote:
> When can we expect the Debian package to include this patch?
> (especially the backported version would be greeeat)
I backported it a long time ago, I thought it was referenced in this bug
thread? Anyway, you can pick up the package here
d
Wonderful!
When can we expect the Debian package to include this patch?
(especially the backported version would be greeeat)
Thanks,
Andy.
Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
>
> Ah, I got a prompt answer from Wayne on the rsync list. I'll attach it.
>
[...]
>
> This is a different bug that was r
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 03:32:08PM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> However, unfortunately it's not fully fixed either :/
> I just stumbled over it while noticing that my rsnapshot root backup
> never gets any file deleted...
Ah, I got a prompt answer from Wayne on the rsync list. I'll atta
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 11:57:34AM -0400, Simon Boulet wrote:
> On 9-Sep-06, at 9:32 AM, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 06:53:30PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
> >> Because I couldn't reproduce it, and I didn't want to close a bug
> >> report
> I was able to reproduce t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
On 9-Sep-06, at 9:32 AM, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 06:53:30PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
Because I couldn't reproduce it, and I didn't want to close a bug
report
I was able to reproduce this bug with the late
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 06:53:30PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
> Because I couldn't reproduce it, and I didn't want to close a bug report
Huh? This should be very simple reproducible by just following the
http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2005-April/012335.html
And yes, with the current rsync/
On Fri 01 Sep 2006, Andy Spiegl wrote:
> > ... and has been fixed, in testing and unstable, for about just as long.
> Even in combination when connecting to a rsync server?
> But then why is the bug report still open?
Because I couldn't reproduce it, and I didn't want to close a bug report
I had
> ... and has been fixed, in testing and unstable, for about just as long.
Even in combination when connecting to a rsync server?
But then why is the bug report still open?
> "stable" is called "stable" because it basically doesn't change.
> Security fixes make it to point releases, but not "simpl
On Fri 01 Sep 2006, Andy Spiegl wrote:
> Hi, I just stumpled over this same bug. :-(
> My backup disks were spilling because rsync never deleted files!
>
> Unfortunately the patch provided by Serge doesn't work
> when rsync connects to an rsync-server. In that case
> the --delete option STILL d
Hi, I just stumpled over this same bug. :-(
My backup disks were spilling because rsync never deleted files!
Unfortunately the patch provided by Serge doesn't work
when rsync connects to an rsync-server. In that case
the --delete option STILL doesn't work as expected.
Leaving off the trailing s
In can meanwhile confirm that this update also solves the problem in
rsnapshot. Upstream has also been updated on this.
Is there any way where this patch could go into Sarge?
--
Serge van Ginderachter
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
I can confirm that the bug is solved with the patch earlier
http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2005-April/012338.html
I updated the Sarge package - rsync version 2.6.4-6 with it and
testrunned it using the --delete option, which works as expected.
'rsync_2.6.4-6.svg1_i386.deb' and
21 matches
Mail list logo
