Hi Robert,
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 01:36:51PM +0200, Robert wrote:
> As promised I would report back after putting the slapd system in production.
> We have now run it for a couple of weeks and all our problems have vanished.
Good to know! Thanks for your feedback.
Greetings
Torsten
Package: slapd
Version: 2.2.23-8
Followup-For: Bug #311491
Hi Torsten,
As promised I would report back after putting the slapd system in production.
We have now run it for a couple of weeks and all our problems have vanished.
Thanks for your help.
kind Regards,
Robert
-- System Information:
Debi
Hi Torsten,
We learn all the time, thanks for your advice. I hereby give you the
information requested. I would like to say again, that my problem has
been solved so far. I have now worked for tree days on the slapd version
as stated below without any problems. Before my this workstation and or
ser
Hi Robert,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 03:58:17AM -0400, Robert de Geus wrote:
> Ps I might have some suggestions for the text used in the
> dpkg-reconfigure script, are you interested?
Sure.
> Version: 2.2.26-3
> Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-21), libdb4.2, libiodbc2 (>= 3.52.2),
> libldap-2.2-7,
Hi Torsten,
I recently concluded another series of tests with the slapd and it seems
my problems have vanished. I will now include the dependencies (had to
learn that one first). I am now testing on a development station on
which normally after a couple of hours the machine would lock up. This
did
Hi Robert,
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 04:02:53PM +0200, Robert de Geus wrote:
> I will try to give you more info a.s.a.p. Somebody found out (hope this
> is true) that for a process that uses posix threat's under kernel 2.6
> the process does not spawn into multiple processes. This is the same for
Hi Torsten,
I will try to give you more info a.s.a.p. Somebody found out (hope this
is true) that for a process that uses posix threat's under kernel 2.6
the process does not spawn into multiple processes. This is the same for
the nscd daemon as well as for slapd so this information seems
consisten
On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
Hi Ulrich,
[...]
That's unlikely to happen. And, BTW: I guess this bug is also a problem
with the current linux kernel. Somebody on linux-kernel pointed out that
he got 10% CPU usage by having 3 processes talk to each other in a ring
inside an endles
| Talking about severities: We will not delay sarge because slapd has a
| performance problem for one user.=20
I guess this is a disputable decision.
This makes sarge unusable for an ldap server. Our whole ldap system (a
few hundred users involved) was repeatedly blocked by this bug,
because
Hi Ulrich,
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 07:10:08PM +0200, Ulrich Hermisson wrote:
> I would be very happy with either kind of solution. Since the package, in
> its current state, cannot be used by us and, as I presume, many other
> people, it would be a big improvement if the problem were solved b
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 12:16:05PM +0200, Ulrich Hermisson wrote:
from www.openldap.org (compiled with "--enable-crypt"). Only when I
compile with the configure option "--with-threads=no", everything is
ok, but the slurpd needs threads. With thread
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 12:16:05PM +0200, Ulrich Hermisson wrote:
> from www.openldap.org (compiled with "--enable-crypt"). Only when I
> compile with the configure option "--with-threads=no", everything is
> ok, but the slurpd needs threads. With threads, also the test 17
> performed by "make te
Package: slapd
Version: 2.2.23-5
Severity: important
The slapd almost stops working while a CPU consuming process like the
one started by
echo 3^ | bc &
is running on the same machine. That is: a query (e.g. querying a
passwd database by pam_ldap) which is answered immediately (i.e. less
13 matches
Mail list logo
