tags 310216 + pending
thanks
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yeah, OK, good, I'll just remove the check in -11 or -1 and wait until
>> another udev user reports a bug telling me everything is broken.
>
> No one will report it because the code doesn't misbehave. I just
> happened to not
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Version: 1.0.15-10
Duh, your mirror is fast.
> MAKEDEV should be run even if udev is installed and active. In that
> case MAKEDEV will create a device node in /dev/.static/dev if
I thought this wasn't the case anymore ?
> possible. That is good, becau
On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 16:28 +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Version: 1.0.15-10
>
> Duh, your mirror is fast.
I installed from incoming to see if the bug had been fixed in the latest
release.
> > MAKEDEV should be run even if udev is installed and acti
Package: libsane
Version: 1.0.15-10
Severity: minor
The libsane postinst includes this paragraph:
if [ ! -e /dev/.udev.tdb -a ! -c /dev/.devfsd ]; then
# create /dev/parport*
if [ ! -c /dev/parport0 ]; then
(cd /dev && /sbin/MAKEDEV parport) || true
fi
4 matches
Mail list logo