Bug#310216: Fails to run MAKEDEV if udev is installed

2005-05-22 Thread Julien BLACHE
tags 310216 + pending thanks Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Yeah, OK, good, I'll just remove the check in -11 or -1 and wait until >> another udev user reports a bug telling me everything is broken. > > No one will report it because the code doesn't misbehave. I just > happened to not

Bug#310216: Fails to run MAKEDEV if udev is installed

2005-05-22 Thread Julien BLACHE
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Version: 1.0.15-10 Duh, your mirror is fast. > MAKEDEV should be run even if udev is installed and active. In that > case MAKEDEV will create a device node in /dev/.static/dev if I thought this wasn't the case anymore ? > possible. That is good, becau

Bug#310216: Fails to run MAKEDEV if udev is installed

2005-05-22 Thread Thomas Hood
On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 16:28 +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote: > Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Version: 1.0.15-10 > > Duh, your mirror is fast. I installed from incoming to see if the bug had been fixed in the latest release. > > MAKEDEV should be run even if udev is installed and acti

Bug#310216: Fails to run MAKEDEV if udev is installed

2005-05-22 Thread Thomas Hood
Package: libsane Version: 1.0.15-10 Severity: minor The libsane postinst includes this paragraph: if [ ! -e /dev/.udev.tdb -a ! -c /dev/.devfsd ]; then # create /dev/parport* if [ ! -c /dev/parport0 ]; then (cd /dev && /sbin/MAKEDEV parport) || true fi