Bug#309415: udev: not fully /bin/sh compatible

2005-08-16 Thread Brian Nelson
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 09:11:22AM -0600, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > > > > Policy is broken. > > > why ? Because Debian aims to be POSIX compilant ? > > > Can you explain please why the Policy is broken ? > > Did you read the debian-devel thread? Apparently not, because it's > > explained there. >

Bug#309415: udev: not fully /bin/sh compatible

2005-08-16 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
> > > Policy is broken. > > why ? Because Debian aims to be POSIX compilant ? > > Can you explain please why the Policy is broken ? > Did you read the debian-devel thread? Apparently not, because it's > explained there. could you possibly include a URL to this thread in this bug report, since not

Bug#309415: udev: not fully /bin/sh compatible

2005-08-16 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Aug 16, Frederik Reiß <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Policy is broken. > why ? Because Debian aims to be POSIX compilant ? > Can you explain please why the Policy is broken ? Did you read the debian-devel thread? Apparently not, because it's explained there. > And if it's realy broken may be y

Bug#309415: udev: not fully /bin/sh compatible

2005-08-16 Thread Frederik Reiß
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > Policy is broken. why ? Because Debian aims to be POSIX compilant ? Can you explain please why the Policy is broken ? And if it's realy broken may be you shoud talk to the people who maintain the policy get thier policy fixed. if they don't want to

Bug#309415: udev: not fully /bin/sh compatible

2005-05-18 Thread Marco d'Itri
On May 18, Vagrant Cascadian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > size is not really the issue, but policy compliance... Policy is broken. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#309415: udev: not fully /bin/sh compatible

2005-05-17 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
> > i believe the following is not fully /bin/sh compliant (it fails to work > > with "posh"): > I do not care about posh, you should spend your time in more useful ways. you should actually show a little respect for the users of the software you package. don't get so defensive- it's not any bett

Bug#309415: udev: not fully /bin/sh compatible

2005-05-17 Thread Marco d'Itri
severity 309415 wishlist tag 309415 wontfix thanks On May 17, Vagrant Cascadian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i believe the following is not fully /bin/sh compliant (it fails to work > with "posh"): I do not care about posh, you should spend your time in more useful ways. All my packages work with

Bug#309415: udev: not fully /bin/sh compatible

2005-05-16 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
Package: udev Version: 0.056-2 Severity: normal Tags: patch i believe the following is not fully /bin/sh compliant (it fails to work with "posh"): if [ -c /dev/.devfsd -o -c /dev/vc/1 ]; then it should be: if [ -c /dev/.devfsd ] || [ -c /dev/vc/1 ]; then as well as: if [ "$RUNLEVEL" = "S" -