Bug#308705: removing ipfwadm

2005-06-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 11:54:40PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:47:40PM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote: > > There is no consensus that this package should be removed. Since I am still > > willing to maintain it, I don't believe removal is appropriate at this time. >

Bug#308705: removing ipfwadm

2005-06-12 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:47:40PM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote: > There is no consensus that this package should be removed. Since I am still > willing to maintain it, I don't believe removal is appropriate at this time. I see, I'm curious how many people actually still use this package, now that 2

Bug#308705: removing ipfwadm

2005-06-08 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
severity 30994 serious thanks On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 08:13:25PM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote: > On Monday 16 May 2005 23.27, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > On May 16, Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I am not sure whether the ipfwadm package should be removed. Kernels > > > up to 2.4 sti

Bug#308705: removing ipfwadm

2005-05-17 Thread Adrian von Bidder
On Monday 16 May 2005 23.27, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On May 16, Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am not sure whether the ipfwadm package should be removed. Kernels > > up to 2.4 still have support for ipfwadm filtering rules, so > > theoretically people could still be using it with curr

Bug#308705: removing ipfwadm

2005-05-16 Thread Marco d'Itri
On May 16, Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am not sure whether the ipfwadm package should be removed. Kernels up to > 2.4 still have support for ipfwadm filtering rules, so theoretically people > could still be using it with current kernels. Wait until sarge has been released and then

Bug#308705: removing ipfwadm

2005-05-16 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 09:49:01AM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote: > I am not sure whether the ipfwadm package should be removed. Kernels up to > 2.4 still have support for ipfwadm filtering rules, so theoretically people > could still be using it with current kernels. > > cc'ing debian-devel. If th

Bug#308705: removing ipfwadm

2005-05-16 Thread Adam McKenna
I am not sure whether the ipfwadm package should be removed. Kernels up to 2.4 still have support for ipfwadm filtering rules, so theoretically people could still be using it with current kernels. cc'ing debian-devel. If the consensus there is that the package should be removed, I'll request its