Bug#306015: A way _not_ to handle bugs

2005-05-04 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If you do immediately lower the severity of a bug I raised the severity > of again, could you please at least put my in the Cc header of the > message you send to the BTS? No, that's not a requirement. If you want to receive notifications, you should a

Bug#306015: A way _not_ to handle bugs

2005-05-04 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What's the syntax for the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for adding a second > submitter? I believe submitter [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] works just fine. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub

Bug#306015: A way _not_ to handle bugs

2005-05-04 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 09:24:34AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > You seem to confuse this with bug closing. It's common practice to > > adjust the severity of a bug to a RC one if a RC issue was mistakenly > > reported as non-RC, and neither yo

Bug#306015: A way _not_ to handle bugs

2005-05-04 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 12:40:21PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: >... > On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 12:27:32PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > first of all, if you downgrade a bug only a good hour after I upgraded > > it, it would be nice if you would: > > - Cc me > > - send a better explanation than

Bug#306015: A way _not_ to handle bugs

2005-05-03 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 306015 important quit On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 12:27:32PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > first of all, if you downgrade a bug only a good hour after I upgraded > it, it would be nice if you would: > - Cc me > - send a better explanation than "This is not a missing dependency, feh" If you a

Bug#306015: A way _not_ to handle bugs

2005-05-03 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You seem to confuse this with bug closing. It's common practice to > adjust the severity of a bug to a RC one if a RC issue was mistakenly > reported as non-RC, and neither your Developers Reference nor your > release team have ever disagreed with this

Bug#306015: A way _not_ to handle bugs

2005-05-03 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 08:30:22AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > severity 306015 grave > > thanks > > > > Hi Steve, > > > > first of all, if you downgrade a bug only a good hour after I upgraded > > it, it would be nice if you would: > > - Cc me

Bug#306015: A way _not_ to handle bugs

2005-05-03 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > severity 306015 grave > thanks > > Hi Steve, > > first of all, if you downgrade a bug only a good hour after I upgraded > it, it would be nice if you would: > - Cc me > - send a better explanation than "This is not a missing dependency, feh" Looking at t

Bug#306015: A way _not_ to handle bugs

2005-05-03 Thread Adrian Bunk
severity 306015 grave thanks Hi Steve, first of all, if you downgrade a bug only a good hour after I upgraded it, it would be nice if you would: - Cc me - send a better explanation than "This is not a missing dependency, feh" I know that downgrading RC bugs makes your RC bugs metric look better