Chaskiel M Grundman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> UsePAM yes
>> PasswordAuthentication no
>
Oh, wait, I see what you're saying. Sorry for being dense; I wasn't
registering password as distinct from keyboard-interactive for some
reason, even though
--On Tuesday, April 19, 2005 16:23:28 -0700 Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I'm using ssh-krb5 with PAM here and I don't use that auth mechanism, so I
know it does work. Perhaps you're missing UsePAM yes in your sshd
configuration?
When you log in with a password, do you see
[EMAIL PROT
Chaskiel M Grundman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'd certainly expect pam to be used for all password validation. If
>> that's not true please give me info on how to reproduce.
> reproduce? As far as I can tell, it never uses pam unless you use the
> kb
--On Tuesday, April 19, 2005 16:23:28 -0700 Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
UsePAM yes
PasswordAuthentication no
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--On Tuesday, April 19, 2005 18:22:12 -0400 Sam Hartman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd certainly expect pam to be used for all password validation. If
that's not true please give me info on how to reproduce.
reproduce? As far as I can tell, it never uses pam unless you use the
kbdint userauth m
I'd certainly expect pam to be used for all password validation. If
that's not true please give me info on how to reproduce.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: ssh-krb5
Version: 3.8.1p1-7
Severity: normal
README.Debian still states
"Unfortunately, privilege separation interacts badly with PAM. [...]
and PAM keyboard-interactive authentication won't work."
but that doesn't seem to be true at all. keyboard-interactive
authentication _is_ enabled,
7 matches
Mail list logo
