On Tuesday 19 April 2005 07:45, Christian Perrier wrote:
> This is why I suggested considering the "--directisa" at least
> in sarge. If it does not harm, as suggested by hwclock man page, why
> not do it?
Can we we 100% sure it does no harm, even on other archs than i386?
I would think the risk o
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Monday 18 April 2005 07:34, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > CC'ing util-linux maintainer(s) to get his/her/their advice as
> > /etc/init.d/hwclock belong to this package.
> >
> > This is about d-i "2nd stage" (after the reboot) failing on Dell
> > Dimension
On Monday 18 April 2005 07:34, Christian Perrier wrote:
> CC'ing util-linux maintainer(s) to get his/her/their advice as
> /etc/init.d/hwclock belong to this package.
>
> This is about d-i "2nd stage" (after the reboot) failing on Dell
> Dimension 8400 machines (a fairly common end user machine) as
CC'ing util-linux maintainer(s) to get his/her/their advice as
/etc/init.d/hwclock belong to this package.
This is about d-i "2nd stage" (after the reboot) failing on Dell
Dimension 8400 machines (a fairly common end user machine) as well as
some other systems, because of hwclock call.
Before I r
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Debian-installer-version: Apr 12 2005;
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc3/sarge-i386-businesscard.iso
uname -a: Linux dydybo 2.6.8-dydybo #1 Thu Apr 14 19:53:58 JST 2005 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: Apr 1 2005
Method: network i
5 matches
Mail list logo
