On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 12:16:49PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 02:51 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > >
> > > The older (lower) version of xprt-xprintorg in testing, supplied by
> > > xprint-xprintorg source, needs to be replaced by the new (higher)
> > > version in u
On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 02:51 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> >
> > The older (lower) version of xprt-xprintorg in testing, supplied by
> > xprint-xprintorg source, needs to be replaced by the new (higher)
> > version in unstable, supplied by xprint source.
>
> This is indeed happening, but x
On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 04:18 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> No, just to stop building that specific binary package from the
> xprint-xprintorg source package, by dropping it from debian/control and
> debian/rules where appropriately.
>
I still don't understand then. Other packages depend
Package: xprint-xprintorg
Severity: important
The xprt-xprintorg binary package is currently built in a higher version
by xprint. This means that a new revision of this package without
dropping this binary package from debian/control would be refused by
ftp-master because there already is a higher
4 matches
Mail list logo