On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 02:30:21AM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
> * Justin Pryzby [Thu, 23 Mar 2006 19:18:25 -0500]:
>
> > Adeodato, I noticed that the mutt build is a bit noisy while applying
> > patches,
> > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=mutt&ver=1.5.11%2Bcvs20060126-2&arch=m68k&stamp=
* Justin Pryzby [Thu, 23 Mar 2006 19:18:25 -0500]:
> Adeodato, I noticed that the mutt build is a bit noisy while applying
> patches,
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=mutt&ver=1.5.11%2Bcvs20060126-2&arch=m68k&stamp=1141353835&file=log&as=raw
Is this bad?
--
Adeodato Simó
tag 301236 patch
thanks
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 10:34:24PM +, Paul Walker wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I hadn't noticed this one before. mutt CVS does indeed allow attachments to
> have (and keep) arbitrary paths, which can't be good. Okay, you have to be
> not paying attention in order to overwrite
Hi all,
I hadn't noticed this one before. mutt CVS does indeed allow attachments to
have (and keep) arbitrary paths, which can't be good. Okay, you have to be
not paying attention in order to overwrite files, but why give people the
chance?
Please try the attached patch, which sanitises the filen
4 matches
Mail list logo
