Bug#299702: hugs shouldn't go into sarge yet

2005-03-15 Thread Isaac Jones
Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package: hugs > Version: 98.200503.08-1 > Severity: normal > > We're not sure the new hugs should go into sarge without matching new > ghc/nhc98 due to library changes. We also need to check these changes > don't cause any breakage elsewhere. Just a note t

Bug#299702: hugs shouldn't go into sarge yet

2005-03-15 Thread Ian Lynagh
severity 299702 serious thanks On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 10:45:19PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-15 22:21]: > > Package: hugs > > Version: 98.200503.08-1 > > Severity: normal > ^^ > > We're not sure the new hugs should go into sarge witho

Bug#299702: hugs shouldn't go into sarge yet

2005-03-15 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-15 22:21]: > Package: hugs > Version: 98.200503.08-1 > Severity: normal ^^ > We're not sure the new hugs should go into sarge without matching new The severity is too low. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, em

Bug#299702: hugs shouldn't go into sarge yet

2005-03-15 Thread Ian Lynagh
Package: hugs Version: 98.200503.08-1 Severity: normal We're not sure the new hugs should go into sarge without matching new ghc/nhc98 due to library changes. We also need to check these changes don't cause any breakage elsewhere. Thanks Ian -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT pref