Bug#295397: xfsprogs: xfs_check manual page incorrect

2005-02-16 Thread Nathan Scott
> > The manual should probably read: > > "Any output from xfs_check that was not due to the "VERBOSE" flag means > > that the filesystem has an inconsistency." Thanks, I'll fix this up in the next version of xfsprogs. cheers. -- Nathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a sub

Bug#295397: xfsprogs: xfs_check manual page incorrect

2005-02-15 Thread Frits Daalmans
Agreed, and I also agree with the description of xfs_check -v in the manual page :-) On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Penio S. Penev wrote: > On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Frits Daalmans wrote: > > | However, the manual page says, at the end of the DESCRIPTION chapter, > | and just before DIAGNOSTICS, that: > | > |

Bug#295397: xfsprogs: xfs_check manual page incorrect

2005-02-15 Thread Penio S. Penev
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Frits Daalmans wrote: | However, the manual page says, at the end of the DESCRIPTION chapter, | and just before DIAGNOSTICS, that: | | "Any NON-VERBOSE output from xfs_check means that the filesystem has an | inconsistency" | | I think that it should instead say | | "Any VERBO

Bug#295397: xfsprogs: xfs_check manual page incorrect

2005-02-15 Thread Frits Daalmans
Package: xfsprogs Version: 2.6.20-1 Severity: minor Tags: patch Hello, I used xfs_check to verify an xfs filesystem. it returned without any output, and the filesystem tests OK. (so far so good :-)) However, the manual page says, at the end of the DESCRIPTION chapter, and just before DIAGNOSTICS,