Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
>
>> Please be so kind and keep the bug number address in the Cc
>>
>> Tuomo Valkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 03:24:59PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>> >> Is any tetex package insta
Hi Tuomo,
Please be so kind and keep the bugnumber address in the Cc line.
Tuomo Valkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 05:54:22PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Could it have been after January 24st?
>
> Unlikely.
Then it is probably not tetex-base's fault.
> And shou
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> Please be so kind and keep the bug number address in the Cc
>
> Tuomo Valkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 03:24:59PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> >> Is any tetex package installed on the system, and can you give the
> >> vers
Please be so kind and keep the bug number address in the Cc
Tuomo Valkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 03:24:59PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Is any tetex package installed on the system, and can you give the
>> version numbers currently installed and, ideally, of the o
Tuomo Valkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: general
> Severity: grave
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
>
>
> Apt-get upgrade just moments ago removed my /usr/local/ symlink and
> replaced it with a hierarchy of empty directories. The contents of
> the proper /usr/local/ on an
Package: general
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Apt-get upgrade just moments ago removed my /usr/local/ symlink and
replaced it with a hierarchy of empty directories. The contents of
the proper /usr/local/ on another disk seem to be intact.
The contents of the new /u
6 matches
Mail list logo
