severity 294197 important
thanks
This is a candidate that we should try to get fixed in etch.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 06:14:21PM +0100, Frank K?ster wrote:
> > >> Hm. unsetting HOME in postinst's environment could relieve you from this
> > >> inconvenience. But I don't know which other effects it could have.
> > > In my opinon, a {post,pre}{install,remove} script should never do
> > > anyt
Hallo Uwe,
I wrote:
> >> Hm. unsetting HOME in postinst's environment could relieve you from this
> >> inconvenience. But I don't know which other effects it could have.
> > In my opinon, a {post,pre}{install,remove} script should never do
> > anything in $HOME, be it mine or root's and regardle
tags 294197 pending
thanks
Uwe Zeisberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>> Hm. unsetting HOME in postinst's environment could relieve you from this
>> inconvenience. But I don't know which other effects it could have.
> In my opinon, a {post,pre}{install,remove} script should never do
> anything
Hello Frank,
Frank Kster wrote:
> you can use sudo's option -H.
Yes, I know this option, but I use it hardly ever. And so only in the
rarest cases I think to use it to upgrade tex.
> Hm. unsetting HOME in postinst's environment could relieve you from this
> inconvenience. But I don't know which
Uwe Zeisberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> The problem here is, that
>
> a) sudo doesn't unset HOME (which is for most cases a good behaviour)
you can use sudo's option -H.
> b) mktexlsr obiously uses ${HOME}/texmf and is not affected by umask[1]
>
> (I'm not sure, if b) alone is already a b
Package: tetex-base
Version: 2.0.2c-6
Severity: minor
Hello,
whenever I upgrade tetex via `sudo apt-get upgrade` it creates the file
${HOME}/texmf/ls-R with owner=root and mode 600:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/texmf$ ls -l
total 0
drwx-- 3 zeisberg users 18 Jan 12 08:58 tex
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/texm
7 matches
Mail list logo
