On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 04:05:13PM +0100, Joachim Nilsson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 11:20:42AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 12:27:35PM +0100, Joachim Nilsson wrote:
> > > Mon 2005-01-31 at 13:30 +0300 Simon Horman wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 04:41:31PM +0100, Jo
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 11:20:42AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 12:27:35PM +0100, Joachim Nilsson wrote:
> > Mon 2005-01-31 at 13:30 +0300 Simon Horman wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 04:41:31PM +0100, Joachim Nilsson wrote:
> > > > [1] - http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 12:27:35PM +0100, Joachim Nilsson wrote:
> Mon 2005-01-31 at 13:30 +0300 Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 04:41:31PM +0100, Joachim Nilsson wrote:
> > > [1] - http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/01/msg00171.html
> > Is gconfig even maintained upstream?
if someone is willing to put the effort in to get it working.
FYI, the patch provided above works fine for me.
Stefan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mon 2005-01-31 at 13:30 +0300 Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 04:41:31PM +0100, Joachim Nilsson wrote:
> > [1] - http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/01/msg00171.html
> Is gconfig even maintained upstream?
Dunno, but 2.6.10-ac5 has the following changelog entry that might
be wo
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 04:41:31PM +0100, Joachim Nilsson wrote:
> Package: kernel
> Followup-For: Bug #292601
>
> Does this[1] help?
>
> Regards
> /Jocke
>
> [1] - http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/01/msg00171.html
Is gconfig even maintained upstream?
Generally the kernel team doesn
Package: kernel
Followup-For: Bug #292601
Does this[1] help?
Regards
/Jocke
[1] - http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/01/msg00171.html
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Local
7 matches
Mail list logo