Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, the new flex is no longer lex/POSIX compatible. It does,
> however, work with modern C/C++ compilers a lot better, is
> reenterant, and one can have multiple lex scanners in a program.
> Because of that, and the fact we have flex-old,
Hi,
Yes, the new flex is no longer lex/POSIX compatible. It does,
however, work with modern C/C++ compilers a lot better, is
reenterant, and one can have multiple lex scanners in a program.
Because of that, and the fact we have flex-old, we are not going to
revert the default flex in
Package: flex
Version: 2.5.31-26
The version of flex in Debian testing no longer works with a
large number of packages which depend on traditional lex
compatibility or POSIX lex compliance. The biggest problem
I have had is that yywrap() now takes an argument of some
type.
Because of this I don'
3 matches
Mail list logo
