tags 290531 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
cvs import now has an -X version, is that what you need?
bye,
//mirabilos
--
If Harry Potter gets a splitting headache in his scar
when he’s near Tom Riddle (aka Voldemort),
does Tom get pain in the arse when Harry is near him?
-- me, wondering why it’s
Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 06:27:38PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>>
>>I am not completely convinced that the bug is not in cvs-upgrade. In
>>older versions, there was a script cvs-co-upgrade (today it's still in
>>/usr/share/doc) that generated a list of "c
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 06:27:38PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>
>I looked closer at
>http://people.debian.org/~frank/cvs-upgrade_2.99.9.lg, and searched for
>trfonts.map, one of the files that got to the trunk wrongly:
>
>cvs import: Importing /cvs/tetex/tetex-base/metapost/config
>U tetex-base/met
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> reassign 290531 cvs
> thanks
>
>
> From what you said, the only cvs-buildpackage command
> you had was cvs-update, which is a glorified way of saying
> cvs import -m'blah' tetex-base source-dist some-tag-that-we-use
I looked closer at
http:
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> reassign 290531 cvs
> thanks
Note that is bug occurs on gluck which has woody's (?) version
installed:
hi cvs 1.11.1p1debian-9woody Concurrent Versions System
According to the logs on people.debian.org, it seems to occur with fi
reassign 290531 cvs
thanks
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 18:31:50 +0100, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> This might be in fact a bug in CVS, hence the copy to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Indeed.
> When I use the cvs-buildpackage and the CVS commands proposed by it
> to import a new upstream ver
6 matches
Mail list logo
