"David Welton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Since there doesn't seem to be any prospect of making tcldom buildable,
>> would you object to a removal request? (I'm just going through old RC
>> bugs; if you want to keep it, that's fine by me.)
>
> I don't want to keep the package, but it should b
Since there doesn't seem to be any prospect of making tcldom buildable,
would you object to a removal request? (I'm just going through old RC
bugs; if you want to keep it, that's fine by me.)
I don't want to keep the package, but it should be orphaned for a bit
prior to removal, IMO, so that so
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 22:16:24 +0100, David N. Welton wrote:
> Matej Vela wrote:
>> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>The build dependency on tclxml can't be fulfilled in sarge.
>>
>> Is there any way we can solve this now that tclxml is gone (#352330)?
>
> Nope. Interested parties wou
Matej Vela wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>Package: tcldom
>>Version: 3.0-1.3
>>Severity: serious
>>Tags: sarge
>>
>>The build dependency on tclxml can't be fulfilled in sarge.
>
>
> Is there any way we can solve this now that tclxml is gone (#352330)?
Nope. Interested
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: tcldom
> Version: 3.0-1.3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sarge
>
> The build dependency on tclxml can't be fulfilled in sarge.
Is there any way we can solve this now that tclxml is gone (#352330)?
Thanks,
Matej
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
5 matches
Mail list logo