On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 11:21:17PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Matt Kraai wrote:
> >CK:
> >>I would be in favour of solution 1, which means printing a note. But
> >>about removing the file: On the one hand I'm not sure if removing the
> >>file automatically is a really good idea. And on the oth
Matt Kraai wrote:
>CK:
I would be in favour of solution 1, which means printing a note. But
about removing the file: On the one hand I'm not sure if removing the
file automatically is a really good idea. And on the other hand I'm not
sure if it's always possible to remove the file. Won't there be f
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 04:16:24PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> On [12/02/05 16:12], Matt Kraai wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 11:45:28PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > > I'm following up on bug report 285568 about dput aborting on ftp error.
> > > I think the ugly traceback has been bann
On [12/02/05 16:12], Matt Kraai wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 11:45:28PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > I'm following up on bug report 285568 about dput aborting on ftp error.
> > I think the ugly traceback has been banned, so we need to decide how to
> > proceed with resolving the bug.
> >
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 11:45:28PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> I'm following up on bug report 285568 about dput aborting on ftp error.
> I think the ugly traceback has been banned, so we need to decide how to
> proceed with resolving the bug.
> I'm pretty much convinced that the current behav
Hi Matt, Christian,
I'm following up on bug report 285568 about dput aborting on ftp error.
I think the ugly traceback has been banned, so we need to decide how to
proceed with resolving the bug.
I'm pretty much convinced that the current behaviour of stopping the
upload on error is the right th
6 matches
Mail list logo
