* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-12-30 17:03]:
> * Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-07 08:44]:
> > You don't need to regenerate them - please just send me the original
> > .jpg so I can reproduce this myself.
>
> Brian, can you please make the original jpeg available that
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-07 08:44]:
> You don't need to regenerate them - please just send me the original
> .jpg so I can reproduce this myself.
Brian, can you please make the original jpeg available that exposes
the bug you've described.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyr
* Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-07 12:24]:
> I can't keep sample images for ever, and I had documented them *ages*
> ago. As in almost a year ago.
Just send the image to the bug report - it cannot be that huge.
> I will try to regenerate these images again when I get the chance.
> Altern
> "Martin" == Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> * Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-05 09:16]:
>> EXAMPLES:
>> For example, have a look at:
>> http://snoopy.apana.org.au/~bam/tmp/dst/dcp00693a_Med.jpg.1.html>
>> It states the image 600 x 800 on the w
* Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-05 09:16]:
> EXAMPLES:
> For example, have a look at:
> http://snoopy.apana.org.au/~bam/tmp/dst/dcp00693a_Med.jpg.1.html>
> It states the image 600 x 800 on the website, but the img tag says 602
> x 802, and Mozilla says 602 x 802.
> Source is at:
> http://
5 matches
Mail list logo
