Hi again,
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 04:40:43PM +0200, wrote:
>
> Next week I will have access to an Ultra1 with hme and see if the
> problem can be reproduced on that box.
FYI, same problem here :-(
Raoul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Hi Jurij,
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 11:03:55PM -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After some further investigation I can now pretty confidently state that
> the culprit for this problem is the ipsec patch, introduced into 2.4.27
> kernel by the previous kernel maintainer Herbert Xu. I have buil
Hi,
After some further investigation I can now pretty confidently state that the
culprit for this problem is the ipsec patch, introduced into 2.4.27 kernel
by the previous kernel maintainer Herbert Xu. I have built two kernels, a
pristine 2.4.27 from www.kernel.org, and another one, with the ips
Jurij Smakov wrote:
[snip]
> >The thing is, that not all telnet-connections fail:
> >
> >- telnet to Linux-Host (try 'telnet mailgw1 25'): works
> >- telnet to Solaris-Host (try 'telnet esslingen'): works
> >- telnet to Ascend MAX4000 Access-Server (m-nas1): fails
> >- telnet to Cisco 7200 VXR (try
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Raoul Borenius wrote:
But how about the kernel from kernel.org? Everything seems fine with
that one.
We have some more UltraIIs, but they are in production use at the moment
so we can't play with those. I did some testing a few weeks ago when
the problem first showed up and fou
Hi Jurij,
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 02:36:23PM -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote:
>
> and so on. So it looks like _outgoing_ packets have bad TCP checksum and
> probably are discarded by the other host. I believe that tcpdump captures
> them after they hit the wire, so that leaves two possibilities: eith
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Raoul Borenius wrote:
Hi Jurij,
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 12:46:30AM -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote:
Hi Raoul,
Could you please check whether the situation have improved with the
current Debian kernels in testing/unstable?
Sorry, no improvement with
kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc64 (2.4.
Hi Jurij,
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 12:46:30AM -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> Hi Raoul,
>
> Could you please check whether the situation have improved with the
> current Debian kernels in testing/unstable?
Sorry, no improvement with
kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc64 (2.4.27-9)
kernel-image-2.6.8-2-spa
Hi Raoul,
Could you please check whether the situation have improved with the
current Debian kernels in testing/unstable?
Thanks and best regards,
Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC
--
To UNSUBS
9 matches
Mail list logo
