Michael Vogt wrote:
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 06:00:04PM +0200, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
I have no idea what I'm doing wrong. So I wrote something what looks more
reasonable than original Geller's patch to me. Am I really only one who cares
that apt is corrupting package it downloads ? This tim
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 06:00:04PM +0200, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> I have no idea what I'm doing wrong. So I wrote something what looks more
> reasonable than original Geller's patch to me. Am I really only one who cares
> that apt is corrupting package it downloads ? This time
> tetex-base_3
Well,
I have no idea what I'm doing wrong. So I wrote something what looks more
reasonable than original Geller's patch to me. Am I really only one who cares
that apt is corrupting package it downloads ? This time
tetex-base_3.0.orig.tar.gz
is corrupted on redownload as its last byte is CR (
3 matches
Mail list logo