Bug#280702: (no subject)

2005-02-26 Thread Olaf van der Spek
Guido Trotter wrote: On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 10:00:37AM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote: Hi, Why? Isn't that handled 'almost' like replacing it with an empty file? No. Replacing it with an empty file will cause dpkg to notice it's a config file, and so replace it only if un-modified on the target

Bug#280702: (no subject)

2005-02-21 Thread Guido Trotter
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 10:00:37AM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote: Hi, > > Why? > Isn't that handled 'almost' like replacing it with an empty file? > No. Replacing it with an empty file will cause dpkg to notice it's a config file, and so replace it only if un-modified on the target host, ask

Bug#280702: (no subject)

2005-02-21 Thread Olaf van der Spek
Guido Trotter wrote: On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 12:23:00AM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote: Hi, the new package doesn't ship imap.cfg anymore... It does not delete the old one, though... So everyone is stuck with a non-working nagios without manual intervention? On the other hand removing it would be

Bug#280702: (no subject)

2005-02-21 Thread Guido Trotter
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 12:23:00AM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote: Hi, > > the new package doesn't ship imap.cfg anymore... It does not delete > > the old one, though... > > So everyone is stuck with a non-working nagios without manual intervention? > On the other hand removing it would be a p

Bug#280702: (no subject)

2005-02-20 Thread Olaf van der Spek
> the new package doesn't ship imap.cfg anymore... It does not delete > the old one, though... So everyone is stuck with a non-working nagios without manual intervention? Reloading nagios configuration files. Nagios 1.3 Copyright (c) 1999-2004 Ethan Galstad ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Last Modified: 10-24-