Why didn't you keep debian-devel as Cc ?
Le jeudi 17 novembre 2005 à 09:31 -0800, Ryan Murray a écrit :
> The debian/changelog file documents the changes _I_ made. And the change I
> made was "new upstream release". The list of bugs that fixes is listed.
> If you want to see details of changes u
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 01:17:44PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> reopen 276871 309224 258934 327464 261979 290916 304027 314449
> thanks
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 04:03:08AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug rep
"Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Personally, I will list multiple bugs in the new upstream release line
> in my changelog, if they are actually fixed.
Personally, I will reopen the bug should you do so on a bug I reported,
without prior explanations sent to me. BTW, a message to
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 11:12:22AM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I looked at all the bugs for gdm and the bugs you reopened were tagged
> as upstream and/or fixed-upstream.
And as the bug reporter, you never get the message that says that the
bug has been tagged. *That* c
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 01:17:44PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> reopen 276871 309224 258934 327464 261979 290916 304027 314449
> thanks
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 04:03:08AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug rep
reopen 276871 309224 258934 327464 261979 290916 304027 314449
thanks
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 04:03:08AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #276871: Date shown in gdm is correctly localized, but only for a m
6 matches
Mail list logo