Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Could you possibly test the 3.0.2 package? (Note, this isn't exactly what
> will be uploaded yet, I'm working my way through all the open bugs, looking
> at fixing easy stuff)
Tested with same incorrect result. Both eth0 and eth1 are started. Have
you tested on a machine wi
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 05:20:57PM -0500, Tim Riker wrote:
> I get the same results with a really small dhclient.conf. Note that my
> eth1 is a cisco wireless card (from kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686). script
> log attached.
Thanks for the log.
I've just tested this with 3.0.2, and it appears to be b
I get the same results with a really small dhclient.conf. Note that my
eth1 is a cisco wireless card (from kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686). script
log attached.
I'm TimRiker on irc.debian.org just FYI.
--
Tim Riker - http://Rikers.org/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Embedded Linux Technologist - http://eLinux.or
tags 270890 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi Tim,
Could you possibly send your entire dhclient.conf?
I've just tried adding
interface "eth0" {
send host-name "eth0";
}
interface "eth1" {
send host-name "eth1";
}
and I get a lot of complaints from dhclient (3.0.2) about the config
file be
4 matches
Mail list logo
