Hi,
I just tried what Markus Steinborn tried and it seems to work for me (i.e.
the setuid bit isn't lost):
# ls -l passwd
-rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 43280 Sep 26 15:59 passwd*
# cat passwd.acl
# file: passwd
# owner: root
# group: root
# flags: s--
user::rwx
group::r-x
other::r-x
# setfacl --rest
Markus Steinborn schrieb:
Yet I did not test it but from a rough look they did it in almost the
same way as I did.
Well, the standard situations seem to work now. But once again I managed
to construct a situation where the SUID-Bit is lost using setfacl
version 2.2.49:
-- cut here
Hi,
I've got mail from the redhat bugzilla, which contains the same bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467936
It states that this bug would have been fixed in acl 2.2.49. Yet I did
not test it but from a rough look they did it in almost the same way as
I did. But they named the
- "Markus Steinborn" wrote:
> Hi Nathan,
> > I've not heard, but agr...@suse.de might be able to shed
> > some more light for you.
> >
> I'm sorry to tell you, bat Andreas Grienbacher (that's obviously one
> of
> his email addresses) has not responded since a year or so. So I do not
>
>
Hi Nathan,
I've not heard, but agr...@suse.de might be able to shed
some more light for you.
I'm sorry to tell you, bat Andreas Grienbacher (that's obviously one of
his email addresses) has not responded since a year or so. So I do not
expect an answer from hom any more.
--
To UNSUBS
- "Markus Steinborn" wrote:
> Nathan Scott wrote:
> > I've informed upstream, will wait to get their thoughts
> Are there any news from upstream?
I've not heard, but agr...@suse.de might be able to shed
some more light for you.
--
Nathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-re
Nathan Scott wrote:
I've informed upstream, will wait to get their thoughts
Are there any news from upstream?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 19:06 +0200, Markus Steinborn wrote:
> tags: patch
> severity: important
I've informed upstream, will wait to get their thoughts.
The developers are English speaking though, so I guess they
will only have the patch mail to work from (and not the
discussion link you kindly fwd
package: acl
tags: 270099 + patch
severity: important
thanks
An additional remark: Please note that the patch for version 2.2.39
works with 2.2.23.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags: patch
severity: important
(The original posting contained the "severity: important" header with a
little misspelling, so I am repeating it.)
A german discussion concerning this bug can be read here
(http://tinyurl.com/442evz). The link is pointing to google groups.
That discussion lead to
10 matches
Mail list logo
