On Thu, 02 Jun 2005, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Roger Leigh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> > I just build -10 and confirm that up
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Roger Leigh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > I just build -10 and confirm that upgrades f
Roger Leigh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I just build -10 and confirm that upgrades from -8 and -9 work ok, as well
> > as
> > a fresh install, as well as purges after each of these.
>
> D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just build -10 and confirm that upgrades from -8 and -9 work ok, as well as
> a fresh install, as well as purges after each of these.
Does the woody upgrade need testing?
- --
Roger Leigh
Roger Leigh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Don,
>
> I tested your latest patch against -9 on sarge/i386 and sid/ppc and it
> worked without problems both upgrading and installing from scratch
> with a clean tetex install. Not that this is any gua
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Don,
I tested your latest patch against -9 on sarge/i386 and sid/ppc and it
worked without problems both upgrading and installing from scratch
with a clean tetex install. Not that this is any guarantee of
perfection, but the patch looks clean and I c
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 09:34:39AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > This is a followup for your report:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/262395
> >
> > The report end up with :
> >> fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdfjadetex.e
reopen 262395
tags 262395 + sid
thanks
Hi,
xmltex 1.9-9 does not fix the postinst failure:
Setting up xmltex (1.9-9) ...
texhash: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R...
texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R...
texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN...
texhash: Updating /var/cache/fo
reassign 306595 xmltex
severity 306595 important
merge 306595 262395
severity 262395 serious
tags 262395 +patch
thanks
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 07:40:00PM +0200, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> > Could you give us the contents of the files in /etc/texmf/fmt.d/
>
> Here is what I have:
>
> -rw-r--r--
9 matches
Mail list logo
