Hi,
Peter Moulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Thu, Jan 20, 2005:
> I believe the patch was submitted on the basis of code inspection rather
> than experience: the buffer was being freed and then subsequently passed
> to another function, i.e. passing an invalid pointer.
This is how I understo
Sorry, I didn't notice Sebastien's earlier message. (Hmm, should get
mutt to sort threads by latest message rather than by earliest.)
Whether or not the patch has any effect for a given person may depend on
the implementation of `free' being used, and on what memory allocations
other library call
2 matches
Mail list logo